Disclaimer: The papers below are intended for private viewing by those who have legitimate access to them. No part of it may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior permission of the respective publishers. If your organization has a valid subscription of the journals, click on the DOI link for the legitimate copy of the paper. If you are having difficulty accessing a copy for any reason, please contact Dr. Natoli.
Coming Soon: Free copies of pre-published, accepted manuscripts will be posted in the future. For now, please contact Dr. Natoli if you would like a copy of any manuscript.
Peer-Reviewed Publications (*Denotes student author)
24. Natoli, A. P., *Allen, L. K., *Ashton, C. M., Lamba, N., & Marek, R. J. (in press). Measuring eating behavior and motivations in the United Arab Emirates and the United States: Evaluating measurement and predictive invariance of the EDE-QS and TEMS. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001352
23. Mulay, A. L., Gottfried, E. D., Ruchensky, J. R., Russell, T., Natoli, A. P., & Hopwood, C. J. (2024). The problem no one is talking about: Forensic evaluators’ lack of familiarity with dimensional approaches to personality and psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172
22. Natoli, A. P., *Murdock, J. G., *Merguie, J. L., & Hopwood, C. J. (2024). Dimensional models of personality and a multidimensional framework for treating personality pathology. BJPsych Advances. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2024.55
21. Natoli, A. P., & *Rodriguez, C. M. (2024). A new performance-based measure of personality functioning impairment: Development and preliminary evaluation of reliability and validity. Discover Mental Health, 4:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-024-00059-4
20. Scheel, N. L., Natoli, A. P., Langley, H. A., & Esat, G. (2024). Bullied immigrant youth, emotional distress, and social well-being: Moderating roles of family and school. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2024.2361615
19. Mulay, A. L., Natoli, A. P., Gottfried, E. D., Cain, N. M., Boyd, S. E., & Waugh, M. H. (2023). There are no coincidences: Proposed usefulness of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders in the conceptualization of QAnon-related threats. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(4), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000206
18. Natoli, A. P., *Concannon, A. B., *Murdock, J. G., & Ruchensky, J. R. (2023). A severity-matching strategy illustrated using the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in violence risk assessment on college campuses. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(4), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000210
17. Roche, M. J., Natoli, A. P., & *Moore, J. (2023). Personality dysfunction linked to future aggression in daily life: Findings from two experience sampling studies. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(4), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000216
16. Natoli, A. P., Gottfried, E. D., & Mulay, A. L. (2023). The process-focused model for assessing risk in forensic populations: Explanation, case example, and initial plans for establishing the necessary evidence base. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 23, 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118
15. Natoli, A. P., *Paez, M., & McGowan, T. G. (2023). Psychodynamic psychotherapy. In C. Markey, & H. S. Friedman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Mental Health (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 829-839). Elsevier, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91497-0.00074-6
14. Natoli, A. P., Bach, B., Behn, A., Cottin Arredondo, M., Gritti, E. S., Hutsebaut, J., Lamba, N., Le Corff, Y., Zimmermann, J., & Lapalme, M. (2022). Multi-national evaluation of the measurement invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale – Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of student and community samples across seven countries. Psychological Assessment. http://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176
13. Natoli, A. P., & Brown, J. F. (2022). Development and initial examination of a measure of emotion regulation knowledge. Journal of Projective Psychology and Mental Health, 29(2), 87-96. ISSN 0971-6610
12. Krishnamurthy, R., Natoli, A. P., Arbisi, P. A., Hass, G. A., & Gottfried, E. D. (2022). Professional practice guidelines for personality assessment: Response to comments by Ben-Porath (2022), Lui (2022), and Jenkins (2022). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104, 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2005075
11. Krishnamurthy, R., Hass, G., Natoli, A. P., Smith, B., Arbisi, P., & Gottfried, E. (2022). Professional practice guidelines for personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1942020
10. Bornstein, R. F., & Natoli, A. P. (2021). Dependent personalities. In R. E. Feinstein (Ed.), Primer on Personality Disorders (pp. 565-588). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197574393.001.0001
9. Natoli, A. P., Schapiro-Halberstam, S., & *Kolobukhova, A. (2021). A multimethod investigation of sex, romantic relationships, and interpersonal dependency. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 2621-2629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01932-x
8. Natoli, A. P. (2021). Personality dynamics behind bars: Improving mental health services in a correctional facility. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 38, 344-347. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000342
7. Natoli, A. P. (2021). Integrating the assessment of implicit personality factors into clinical practice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103, 427-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1903909
6. Natoli, A. P. (2019). More methods can result in more knowledge: Why psychology needs to use multi-method approaches. The PsyPAG Quarterly, 112, 11-13. Link
5. Natoli, A. P. (2019). The DSM’s reconnection to psychoanalytic theory through the alternative model for personality disorders. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 67, 1023-1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120903060
4. Bornstein, R. F., & Natoli, A. P. (2019). Clinical utility of categorical and dimensional perspectives on personality pathology: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000365
3. Bornstein, R. F., Maracic, C. E., & Natoli, A. P. (2018). The psychodynamic perspective. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 52-83). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n3
2. Natoli, A. P., & Bornstein, R. F. (2017). Integrative assessment of interpersonal dependency: Contrasting sex differences in response patterns on self-attributed and implicit measures. Journal of Projective Psychology and Mental Health, 24, 26-33. Link
1. Natoli, A. P., Nelson, S., Lengu, K., & Huprich, S. K. (2016). Sensitivity to criticism differentially mediates the relationship between interpersonal problems and state and trait depression. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1338
Other Edited Texts
3. Suler, J. R., & Natoli, A. P. (2011). Photos remembered and forgotten. In Suler, J. R., Photographic psychology: Image and psyche (online). True Center Publishing.
2. McNair Thesis: Natoli, A. P. (2012). Using ambiguous images to clarify life situations. Retrieved from http://www.truecenterpublishing.com/photopsy/ambiguous_images.pdf
1. Capstone Thesis: Natoli, A. P. (2011). The psychologically beneficial aspects of photography. Retrieved from http://truecenterpublishing.com/photopsy/psy_benefits_photo.pdf (Advisor: John R. Suler, Ph.D.)
Preprints and Other Non-Peer-Reviewed Publications
1. Natoli, A. P. & Bornstein, R. F. (2019). Validating the Level of Personality Functioning Scale: We don’t use multimethod research designs. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nhrd2